At the store yesterday wandering the aisles looking for coffee amongst other things, I saw what looked to be an attractive girl down an aisle, and, being the good PUA that I am, I decided to wander that way to see what was what.
I haven’t been approaching much lately (in the US, with the COVID panic, mask wearing, etc., cold approach is extremely difficult right now), but I have done a few one offs at the grocery store, all of which have gone nowhere.
Still, no reason not to keep trying.
However, as I got closer, I realized the girl was clearly too young: 14, maybe 15 tops. Easy mistake to make from a distance, but as I passed by I realized why I thought she might be a hot chick from down the aisle–she was wearing booty shorts with a crop top, and for her age, had very large, lovely breasts. In other words, from her body to the way she was dressing, she presented as a sexually mature female.
And it got me thinking…
The first thought is one society shudders to admit, but is nonetheless true, which is that there are many girls who by age 14/15, are sexually mature females–or at least present as sexually mature females–that almost any man, given the chance, would fuck. No, that doesn’t make men creeps: it’s simply a biological reality. Understand, there are lots of 14-15 year old girls who would love to fuck older men too, given the chance. And in point of fact, most societies that have existed prior to now didn’t see anything wrong with such an arrangement. People may balk at that, but our DNA doesn’t give a fuck, and as Jeff Goldblum famously noted in Jurassic Park, “life finds a way.”
The second thought however, is that for the most part, it’s probably good we don’t allow girls that young to fuck older men (and vice-versa), or that we at least make them wait until they turn 18 to do so (although as you’ll see, I think that age should probably be lowered to 16 or 17). Because while I generally reject the “maturity” argument feminists and white knights and others make on behalf of girls in their late teens or early 20s, it’s a fair point to make about girls who can’t yet legally drive a car.
But here’s what I don’t understand: why the bipolar reaction? What I mean by that, is if we really believe young girls are too innocent and naive to be sexual beings, why are we allowing them to wear short skirts, show all kinds of skin, and parade around with their breasts hanging out of spaghetti strap tank tops. Like, if we don’t want little girls to be sluts…shouldn’t we stop them from dressing and acting like sluts?
The recent hullaballoo about “Cuties,” the Netflix documentary in which a bunch of 11-year-olds basically act like strippers who don’t take their clothes off, was understandable. But in a culture where we glorify instagram and Tik-Tok and OnlyFans, is it really such a surprise this is happening? It shouldn’t be. And to be quite honest, if that’s what women want to do: show their asses and tits and use their bodies to get attention and/or profit, OK fine–but let’s not then turn around and shame men for wanting to fuck them. I mean for fuck’s sake, how else are we supposed to react to endless imagery of 19 year-old ass?
It’s almost like we tacitly approve of shameless acts of female sexuality, but as soon as men pay attention or say they prefer younger women–or heaven forbid chicks act on those impulses–everyone freaks the fuck out. Why? Why don’t you get equally pissed at the young chicks posting endless sexual imagery on their social media accounts, or dressing like sluts at 14 years old?
I mean, to be quite honest, women are perfectly capable of deciding who they want to sleep with–probably by 16/17–and if that happens to be an older man, why does it matter? It shouldn’t. Hell, she’ll probably get a better experience than she will with a guy her age. But for some reason that freaks people out.
And you know why? The simple reason? Because deep down most people still don’t accept that women are equally capable or intelligent as men, and we sure as shit don’t hold them equally responsible for their decisions. Because no matter how many parents drape “girl power” or “the future is female” on their little girls, we don’t actually believe it (it’s kinda like guys who crow that they’re “alpha”–if that was actually true, you wouldn’t have to say it). What white knights and feminists either don’t want to admit or don’t realize, is that when they make arguments about how older men dating younger women is somehow wrong and/or predatory, what they’re actually arguing is that women aren’t capable of making adult decisions–even when we recognize them as legal adults. They’re also failing to recognize just how much power a hot young chick has–arguably more raw power than any other group in society aside from extraordinarily rich and powerful men.
I’m not sure I quite realized this until now, but this is actually the biggest underlying problem with our society. Not just how we treat women, but the general thrust of the narrative we now find ourselves in. Because, for the sake of “equality”, we tell little girls to act like men, to play sports and compete and adopt other masculine traits, that they can do whatever they want, etc., when what they actually want to do is show their ass on IG and get male attention.
But it doesn’t stop there–it’s not just women we treat this way. It’s also the young in general. We’ve come to a place where women and children get the benefit of the doubt in all things, and are thought of in some ways as better or more capable, when the fact is they’re not.
For example, we treat children as if they have some kind of stranglehold on truth and justice when the truth is most of the time, they don’t know shit, and are more likely to be wrong or do bad things than adults. And we infantilize women in the same way, pretending as if they always do the right thing or are somehow more noble than men, when the truth again, is that they’re probably more likely to fuck up or act out or lie–and the main reason is that we never hold either group responsible for their actions. Women have been given equal rights and opportunities in terms of employment, education, sexual freedom, etc., but society has never forced them to accept the responsibility that comes with that freedom.
Look no further than what happened to Aziz Ansari, who was famously cancelled by one “Grace” at the height of the #metoo movement. Consider that for a moment: we allowed a man’s entire career to be destroyed because an anonymous beautiful young woman was basically uncomfortable that he tried to have sex with her AFTER they’d gone down on each other! Does that sound like a society that treats men and women equally? The simple answer is no, it doesn’t. It sounds like a society where men are criminalized for being sexual beings and women can basically do whatever the fuck they want, cry foul after the fact, and get all kinds of attention in the bargain.
There’s a lot of “whamen bad” sentiments in the Manosphere I don’t agree with, but part of the reason we see these kinds of takes is that we’ve come to a point where female sexuality has become ubiquitous to the point of being offensive; where women can use all of their sexual agency and attractiveness for personal gain (OnlyFans, IG, etc.), but men are shamed for using whatever power they achieve through age, wealth, and status to attract women–and what’s worse, if a woman decides, even long after the fact, that she’s upset about any sort of sexual experience with a man, she can accuse him of sexual assault and probably have him cancelled if not charged with a crime. Indeed, the more rich, powerful, and famous the guy is, the more likely society is to believe he’s guilty.
“They are dependent, not upon strength, but upon craft; and hence their instinctive capacity for cunning, and their ineradicable tendency to say what is not true. For as lions are provided with claws and teeth, and elephants and boars with tusks, bulls with horns, and the cuttle fish with its cloud of inky fluid, so Nature has equipped woman, for her defence and protection, with the arts of dissimulation; and all the power which Nature has conferred upon man in the shape of physical strength and reason has been bestowed upon women in this form. Hence dissimulation is innate in woman, and almost as much a quality of the stupid as of the clever. It is as natural for them to make use of it on every occasion as it is for those animals to employ their means of defence when they are attacked; they have a feeling that in doing so they are only within their rights.”
In other words, women are by nature dishonest, but unlike men, there’s no conscious registry of the lie–she doesn’t even realize she’s doing something immoral. This is probably due to the evolutionary need to conceal paternity for the safety of her children, as well as the need to avoid responsibility for mistakes in tribal society, as this could lead to punishment or exile.
He also wrote this in the same piece:
“And so we find that young girls, in their hearts, look upon domestic affairs or work of any kind as of secondary importance, if not actually as a mere jest. The only business that really claims their earnest attention is love, making conquests, and everything connected with this – dress, dancing, and so on.”
Is this not essentially true as demonstrated by how obsessed women are with social media, online dating and the attention these platforms garner?
Feels like I’ve gone a bit off course, so let me get to the point: the primary reason we find ourselves in such a shitty place in 2020 is that we’ve become a childish, feminine society. We prize leisure, aesthetics, and grievance over philosophy, hard work, and prudence. People don’t read books or think deeply about the world; instead they show their ass on IG or Tik-Tok and/or spend their time watching people show their ass on IG or Tik-Tok. Think about this: how many people can even watch television or a movie anymore without simultaneously playing with their fucking smartphone?
Or consider the whole Black Lives Matter phenomenon that’s been going on–it’s entirely about virtue signaling and symbolism, not substance. Because if you’re a hot, young white chick it’s a lot easier to put a black square up on IG for day and blame all of society’s problems on white men, then go back to drinking at brunch on the weekends and your life of privilege and leisure (most, if not all of it paid for by white men) than it is to actually do the work that might truly help black people. And Ibram Kendi and Robin DeAngelo and the rest of the assholes pushing anti-racism (which is actually quite racist) aren’t any better–these are not serious people: they’re just charlatans making a profit off of stupid white liberals who lack the sense to think about what it is they’re reading. It’s a movement of LARPers more concerned with appearing to stand for social justice than actually accomplishing anything of substance.
But then, what do we expect? Like, we have universities who have departments entirely devoted to the study of grievance. We prize victimhood. And we’ve taught an entire generation of people to be on the constant lookout for things to be offended by. Again, these are feminine, childlike values, a reflection of the fact we’ve become a feminine, childlike society. We no longer build and create–we tear down and criticize.
Anyway, I realize I’m just ranting now so I’ll stop here. Not exactly a post that helps guys with women or pick up, but I had to get it off my chest. I suppose the only good news is that the world is now built for players once we get past this COVID thing. Because chicks want attention from high value men, they want to fuck and be sluts, and most men are too feminized or faggoty to trigger that attraction. RedQuest posed a good question yesterday on Twitter:
I think the main reason is that guys in their 20s are either naturals (less than 5%) or have no idea how to get women and either rely on “getting lucky” or have given up. Very few of them read either, which is another problem.
OK, end rant. And don’t worry, we’ll get back to game–the next post will be on texting strategy.